Dorset Voluntary and Community Sector Assembly

News

What Is Strategic Commissioning – And Why It Matters

5th December 2025

Strategic commissioning is the NHS’s new long-term, evidence-led approach to planning, funding and shaping health and care services. It replaces short-term, transactional contracting with a 5-year, outcomes-focused population health model.

From April 2026, strategic commissioning becomes the core statutory function of Integrated Care Boards (ICBs). It directly determines:

  • What services are commissioned
  • Who delivers them
  • At what scale (neighbourhood, place, system)
  • With what outcomes and value for money

It is designed to deliver the NHS’s three major system shifts:

  • From treatment to prevention
  • From hospital to community
  • From analogue to digital

 

The Four Stages of Strategic Commissioning

 

  1. Understanding Population Need

ICBs must carry out annual Integrated Needs Assessments using:

  • Linked health, care, housing and social data
  • Public health intelligence
  • VCSE insight and trusted community intelligence
  • Lived experience and co-production
  • Risk stratification and population segmentation

This stage explicitly requires understanding:

  • Health inequalities
  • Underserved and inclusion health groups
  • Demand pressures now and into the future

 

  1. Developing Long-Term Population Health Strategy

Each ICB must publish a 5-year Population Health Improvement Plan by January 2026, built from:

  • Integrated Needs Assessments
  • Health & Wellbeing Board strategies
  • Neighbourhood Health Plans
  • National NHS priorities

Each priority must include:

  • Agreed outcomes
  • Delivery milestones
  • Delivery scale (neighbourhood → system)
  • Named leadership and governance

This stage also includes:

  • Care pathway redesign
  • Joint commissioning with Local Authorities
  • Planned service reconfiguration and decommissioning (with consultation)

 

  1. Commissioning, Investment & Market Shaping

ICBs will use strategic commissioning to:

  • Shift funding toward prevention and early intervention
  • Introduce outcome-based contracts
  • Shape provider markets across NHS, Local Authorities and VCSE
  • Apply Provider Selection Regime (PSR) flexibilities
  • Introduce risk-share and longer-term contracting models

Importantly, the framework explicitly requires:

  • Investment in community and VCSE-led services
  • Active market support for fragile and prevention-focused services
  • Social value and neighbourhood delivery models

 

  1. Evaluation, Improvement & Decommissioning

All commissioned services will be:

  • Continuously evaluated against:
    • Outcomes
    • Inequalities
    • Access
    • Productivity
  • Reviewed using both data and lived experience
  • Scaled if successful
  • Decommissioned if they do not demonstrate impact

This represents a major cultural shift from funding “activity” to funding “evidenced impact”.

 

What This Means for the VCSE

 

1) The framework positions VCSE organisations as:

  • A core system delivery partner, not a peripheral contributor
  • Prevention and early intervention providers
  • Neighbourhood health delivery partners
  • Trusted community intelligence brokers
  • Co-designers with lived experience
  • System integrators through social value

2) The future commissioning environment will increasingly move away from:

  • One-year grants
  • Unstable short-term funding
  • Fragmented service models

3) And towards:

  • Longer-term outcome-based contracts
  • Neighbourhood-scale provision
  • Consortia and alliance delivery
  • Integrated community pathways

 

4) Key Opportunities for the VCSE

  • Stronger formal influence over commissioning priorities
  • Greater system investment in prevention
  • A guaranteed role within neighbourhood health models
  • Longer-term funding stability through commissioning
  • Increased recognition of VCSE as anchor organisations
  • Expansion of VCSE into pathway leadership roles

 

5) Key Risks If the VCSE Is Not Ready

  • Decommissioning decisions made without VCSE influence
  • Smaller organisations excluded from system-scale contracts
  • Short-term grant funding disappearing without replacement
  • Increased competition from non-VCSE providers
  • Marginalisation where outcomes and impact cannot be evidenced

 

What VCSE Organisations Now Need to Be Ready For

 

1) VCSE organisations will increasingly need:

  • Outcome and impact measurement capability
  • Digital and data readiness
  • Contract governance and delivery confidence
  • Partnership and consortium working
  • Neighbourhood-scale operating models
  • Strong safeguarding, financial and quality systems
  • Clear social value and prevention impact evidence

 

2) Key Questions the VCS Must Now Be Asking

 

  • How will VCSE be embedded in Integrated Needs Assessments?
  • Where does VCSE sit in neighbourhood-level commissioning?
  • Will there be VCSE consortia for system contracts?
  • How will smaller organisations be protected during market reshaping?
  • How is lived experience shaping real commissioning decisions?
  • How will prevention funding reach VCSE providers in practice?
<